CROSSING BOUNDARIES: LECTURERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON THE USE OF WHATSAPP TO SUPPORT TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/579Keywords:
WhatsApp, boundary crossing, boundary objects, social media, blended learning, open distance learning, higher educationAbstract
While literature continues to promote mobile learning and, in particular, the use of mobile phones for teaching and learning in blended and open distance learning (ODL) to bridge the digital divide, many lecturers still struggle to understand and engage with it to support their teaching practices. Using the theoretical notion of ‘boundary crossing’, this study reflects on how three South African higher educators introduced WhatsApp, a mobile instant messaging application, into their teaching practices, within a blended mode of delivery, both for distance education but also campus-based learners. Following their experiences with using WhatsApp as a boundary object in their engagement with learners, we explore how a pedagogical model, rules of engagement, group ownership and learner profile impacted on their teaching and their students’ learning practices. In this article we argue that mobile technology such as WhatsApp can, by acting as a boundary object, assist in increasing immediacy and connection not only in informal, but also in formal blended and open distance learning contexts, facilitating reflection, coordination, identification and, in some cases, with students’ control and ownership, transformation. However, more research is needed to include experiences of students, to explore in more depth the ethical issues of using WhatsApp in particular contexts, and to assess the potential to transfer these findings into larger ODL contexts.Â
References
Akkerman, S. F. and A. Bakker. 2011. Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research 81(2): 132−169. http://rer.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.3102/0034654311404435 (accessed 23 May 2014).
Akkerman, S. F. and M. van Eijck. 2013. Re-theorising the student dialogically across and between boundaries of multiple communities. British Educational Research Journal 39(1): 60−72.
Attewell, J. 2005. From research and development to mobile learning: Tools for Education and training providers and their learners. In 4th World Conference on mLearning. http://www.mlearn.org/mlearn2005/CD/papers/Attewell.pdf.
Bandura, A. 1971. Social learning theory. New York City: General Learning Press.
Bere, A. 2012. A comparative study of student experiences of ubiquitous learning via mobile devices and learner management systems at a South African university. In 14th Annual conference on world wide web application, ed. P. A. van Brakel. Cape Town.
Bower, M. 2008. Affordance analysis − Matching learning tasks with learning technologies. Educational Media International 45(1): 3−15. doi:10.1080/09523980701847115. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09523980701847115
Brown, C. and L. Czerniewicz. 2010. Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26(5): 357−369.
Church, K. and R. de Oliveira. 2013. What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging Behaviors with Traditional SMS. In Mobile HCI 2013 − Collaboration and Communication. Munich, Germany: ACM, 352−361.
Cook, J., N. Pachler and C. Bradley. 2008. Bridging the gap? Mobile phones at the interface between informal and formal learning. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology 4(1): 3−18. http://www.rcetj.org/index.php/rcetj/article/view/34 (accessed 4 April 2014).
Dillon, P. 2008. A pedagogy of connection and boundary crossings: Methodological and epistemological transactions in working across and between disciplines. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45(3): 255−262.
Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Herrington, J., T. C. Reeves and R. Oliver. 2010. A guide to authentic e-learning. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, L., S. Adams Becker, V. Estrada, V. and A. Freeman. 2014. NMC Horizon Report : 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
Kirschner, P., J-W. Strijbos, K. Kreijns and P. J. Beers, 2004. Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development 52(3): 47−66.
Lui, T. C. 2007. Teaching in a wireless environment: A case study. Educational Technology and Society 10(1): 107−123.
Madge, C., J. Meek, J. Wellens and T. Hooley. 2009. Facebook , Social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.’ Learning, Media and Technology 34(2): 141−55. doi:10.1080/17439880902923606. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17439880902923606
Makoe, M. 2012. Teaching digital natives: Identifying competencies for mobile learning facilitators in distance education. South African Journal of Higher Education 26(1): 91−104.
Mcloughlin, C. and M. J. W. Lee. 2007. Social software and participatory learning : Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 Era. Ascilite Singapore: 664−675.
Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nicholson, S. 2002. ‘Socialization in the “virtual hallwayâ€: Instant messaging in the asynchronous web-based distance education classroom.’ The Internet and Higher Education 5(4): 363−372. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751602001276
Norman, D. A. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
O’Sullivan, P. B., S. K. Hunt and L. R. Lippert 2004. ‘Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age.’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4): 464−90. doi:10.1177/0261927X04269588. http://jls.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0261927X04269588
Pimmer, C. and U. Groehbiel. 2013. The affordances of social mobile media for boundary crossing. Integrating formal and informal learning. SSRE2013: 2011−2014.
Pimmer, C. and N. Pachler. 2014. Mobile learning in the workplace: Unlocking the value of mobile technology for work-based education. In Increasing access through mobile learning, ed. Mohamed Ally and Avgoustos Tsinakos, 193−203. Vancouver, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University. http://www.col.org/PublicationDocuments/pub_Mobile Learning_web.pdf.
Rajasingham, L. 2011. Will mobile learning bring a paradigm shift in higher education? Education Research International 2011, Article ID 528495: 10 pages Doi: 10.1155/2011/528495
Rambe, P. and A. Bere. 2013. Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 44(4): 544−561. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjet.12057 (accessed 4 April 2014).
Rambe, P. and C. Chipunza. 2013. Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively-generated resources. International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology: 331−337. Atlantis Press.
Rambe, P. and D. Ng’ambi. In press. Learning with and from facebook − uncovering power assymetries in educational interactions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
Sharples, M., P. Mcandrew, M. Weller, R. Ferguson, E. Fitzgerald, T. Hirst, Y. Mor and M. Gaved. 2012. Innovating pedagogy 2012. Milton Keynes. http://www.open.ac.uk/personalpages/mike.sharples/Reports/Innovating_Pedagogy_report_July_2012.pdf
Siemens, G. 2005. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2(1): 3−10.
Stark, S. and H. Torrance. 2005. Chapter 3: Case Study. In Research methods in the social sciences, ed. B. Somekh and C. Lewin, 33−40. London: Sage Publications.
Veletsianos, G. 2010. Emerging technologies in distance education. Edmonton: AU Press. http://www.aupress.ca/books/120177/ebook/99Z_Veletsianos_2010-Emerging_Technologies_in_Distance_Education.pdf (accessed 4 April 2014).
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice, learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Witt, P. L., L. P. Wheeless and M. Allen. 2006. The relationship between teacher immediacy and Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis. In Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances through Meta-Analysis, ed. B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell and M. Allen: 149−68. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yeboah, J. and G. D. Ewur. 2014. The Impact of Whatsapp Messenger Usage on students’ performance in tertiary institutions in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice 5(6): 157−164.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2015-11-06
Published 2015-11-06
