A Critical Analysis of Ephesians 5:21-33 in the Light of Christian Marriage in Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/17072

Keywords:

Ephesians 5:21–33, husband, wife, Christian marriage, marital problems, Ebonyi State

Abstract

Ephesians 5:21-33 focused on the relationship between husband and wife. However, the teachings of Ephesians 5:21-33 have been greatly ignored by some Christian couples in Ebonyi State and, consequently, resulted in marital problems such as domestic violence, divorce, frequent quarrelling, and so on. The study addressed this problem from the optic of Ephesians 5:21-33. The historical-critical method was used to study the text, while in-depth interviews served as a means of data collection. A purposive sampling technique was employed to select ten respondents who were willing to participate in the study. All data generated in the study were qualitatively analysed. The findings indicated that the call for wives to submit to their husbands does not imply inferiority but absolute obedience to the divine order in marriage. Also, the husband’s headship over the wife does not denote dominance but care, protection, service and love. The study encouraged Christian husbands and wives, especially in Ebonyi State, to love and submit to one another, thereby affirming the equality of husband and wife in dignity without denying their different roles.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Balch, D. L. 1988. “Household Codes” in Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament. Atlanta: Scholars Press

Balla, P. 2003. The Child-Parent Relationship in the New Testament and its Environment. Peabody: Hendrickson.

Balz, H. and G. Schneider. 1990. Exegetical dictionary of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Bartchy, S. S. 2005. “Undermining Ancient Patriarchy: The Apostle Paul's Vision of a Society of Siblings.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 292, 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/014610799902900203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014610799902900203

Basden, N. 1966. Igbo Marriage, Scotland: Edinburgh.

Belz, L. M. 2013. “The Rhetoric of Gender in the Household of God: Ephesians 5:21-33 and Its Place in Pauline Tradition.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago.

Best, E. 1998. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Ephesians. Edinburgh: T and T Clark.

Bruce, F. F. 1984. The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and the Ephesians. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

Casimir, A., M. C. Chukwuelobe, and C. Ugwu. 2014. “The Church and Gender Equality in Africa: Questioning Culture and the Theological Paradigm on Omen Oppression.” Open Journal of Philosophy 42, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.42024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.42024

Chadwick, H. 1976. “Ephesians” Peake’s Commentary on the Bible. Nairobi: Thomas Nelson and Sons

Coontz, S. 2006. Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage. Penguin. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com

Dahl, N. A. and D. H. Juel. 2000. “Ephesians” Harper Collins Bible Commentary. New York: Harper San Fransisco

George. H. and R. Scott. 1968. Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Girard, M. 2000. “Love as Subjection, the Christian Ideal for Husbands and Wives: A Structuralist Study of Ephesians 5:21–33” In Women Also Journeyed with Him: Feminist Perspective on the Bible. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.

Gombris, T. G. 2005. “A Radically New Humanity: The Function of the Haustafel in Ephesians.” JETS 482

Hanson, K. C. 1996. “Kinship” The Social Sciences and New Testament Interpretation. Peabody: Hendrickson.

Henry, M. 2006. “Ephesians” Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible. USA: Hendrickson Publishers

Hendrix, H. 1988. “On the Form and Ethos of Ephesians.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review 42 (4).

Hoehner, H. W. 2006. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.

Keener, C. S. 1992. Paul, Women, and Wives. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers.

Kobelski, P. J. 2007. “Ephesians” The New Jerome Commentary. India: Indira Printers

Miles, C. A. 2006. “Patriarchy or Gender Equality? The Letter to the Ephesians on Submission, Headship, and Slavery. Dialogue.” A Journal of Mormon Thought, 392, 70–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/45227240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/45227240

Mollenkott, V. R. 2003. Emancipative Elements in Ephesians 5:21–33: Why Feminist Scholarship Has Often Left Them Unmentioned, and Why They Should be Emphasized. A Feminist Companion to the Deutero-Pauline Epistles. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press

Nnachi, E. 2021. “Ebonyi Man Admits Beating Divorce-Seeking Wife for Demanding Sex.” The Punch Newspaper, July 1, 2021.Accessed August 16, 2023. https://punchng.com/ebonyi-man-admits-beatin g-divorce-seeking-wife-for-demanding-sex/

Nuyen, A. T. 1992. “The Role of Rhetorical Devices in Postmodernist Discourse.” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 183–194.

Sampley, J. P. 2004. And the Two Shall Become One Flesh; a Study of Traditions in Ephesians 5:21–33. Cambridge: University Press.

O’Brien, P. T. 1999. The Letter to the Ephesians.USA: Eerdmans

Osiek, C. and D. L. Balch. 1990.Families in the New Testament World: Households and House Churches. Louisville: Westminister John Knox,

Russell, J. C. 1958. “Late Ancient and Medieval Population.” Transactions of American Philosophical Society 483, 1–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/1005708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1005708

Schnackenburg, R. 2001. Epistle to the Ephesians: A Commentary. A and C Black.

Stark, R. 1996. The Rise of Christianity: A Sociologist Reconsiders History. Princeton: University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214290

Turaki, Y. 2006. “Ephesians” African Bible Commentary. Nairobi: Word Alive

Webster, M. 2020. “Patriarchy” Merriam Webster dictionary. Accessed August 23, 2023. https://tinyurl.com/y6wpaenl.

Wolf and Musculus. 2011. “Commentary on Ephesians” Reformation Commentary on Scripture: Galatians and Ephesians. USA: Intervarsity Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Unachukwu, Daniel. “A Critical Analysis of Ephesians 5:21-33 in the Light of Christian Marriage in Ebonyi State, Nigeria”. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/17072.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2024-06-26
Accepted 2024-07-30
Published 2024-08-20